FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s defense seems to have landed on two tactics after three weeks of government testimony: Confuse the jury on technical terms, or line up items for an eventual appeal.

Thursday saw the final testimony from an FTX employee, onetime general counsel Can Sun, who testified that he was not told about and did not okay the use of FTX customer funds for expenses at Alameda, Bankman-Fried’s hedge fund, nor for other uses like loans to Bankman-Fried. And, Sun said, he didn’t know that Alameda was given special privileges on the FTX crypto exchange.

“Everything was unequivocally that FTX protects customer assets 100%,” Sun testified, adding that he “never approved anything like that, and never would have. Bankman-Fried had assured him that customer assets at FTX “were received, safeguarded, and segregated” from FTX’s own funds (used for things like vendors or paying bills) “so that they would not be misappropriated,” according to Sun.

“Neither FTX, Alameda, or anyone has rights to those assets because it belongs to the user,” Sun said.

Prior to Sun, three of Bankman-Fried’s former top executives at FTX and Alameda had testified and pled guilty to misusing customer funds, leading to a $7 billion shortfall when FTX customers demanded their money back. They also admitted to adding coding that allowed for Alameda to take essentially unlimited losses on the FTX exchange, covered by customer funds; and lying to investors, customers, and lenders.

Sun seemed to be something of the adult in the room at FTX, at least compared to the gang of Bankman-Fried’s friends running Alameda and FTX (a lineup that included his sometimes girlfriend Caroline Ellison; Nishad Singh, Bankman-Fried’s little brother’s close friend; and Gary Wang, a math-camp friend who lived with Bankman-Fried at MIT). Sun, by contrast, earned a PhD from Princeton, graduated from Yale Law, and worked at a number of prestigious firms prior to joining FTX in August 2021.

With Sun, once again, the defense missed ample opportunities on cross-examination. For instance, Sun talked on direct about a dramatic day on November 7, days before FTX and Alameda filed for bankruptcy.

Bankman-Fried was trying to bring in Apollo Global Management as an investor, and Apollo asked Sun for balance sheets. Sun was in Bankman-Fried’s penthouse apartment in the Bahamas with Bankman-Fried, his father Joe Bankman, Nishad Singh, and another executive, Ramnik Arora, when he received the balance sheets—showing the $7 billion that Alameda had taken from FTX customers and couldn’t repay.

“I was shocked,” he testified. He began volleying questions at everyone in the room, and said on Thursday he “did not get straight responses.” Bankman-Fried was busy typing, and running off to take calls; Singh, Sun recalled, was “pale, gray” and “it looked like his soul had been plucked away from him.” The spreadsheets were sent to Apollo, and soon, Bankman-Fried pulled Sun aside. Apollo was asking for “legal justification” for Alameda taking the funds from FTX customers, he told Sun, and asked Sun to come up with some. Sun did so, later that evening running them by Bankman-Fried and saying there was no basis for any of the frameworks Sun had considered.

At around 11 p.m., Singh asked Sun to go for a walk. He was concerned about “personal exposure,” the multi-million-dollar loans he’d been given from Alameda and FTX, and the no-liquidation provision he’d coded into FTX’s exchange for Alameda, “the same mechanism by which Alameda was able to withdraw funds from the exchange,” Singh explained to Sun. Singh also told Sun (as Singh said in his own testimony) that he’d discovered the multi-billion dollar debt in August or September.

Here was a lob to the defense: Singh, who’s admitted to his crimes, and who left the Bahamas days later and met with prosecutors, was worried about his own personal exposure and his potential criminal activity? Couldn’t this shift some of the blame from their client, who at least stayed in the Bahamas with the sinking ship of FTX?

But the defense, which failed to make a villain of Singh when he testified, didn’t ask Sun a single question about Singh.

Instead, defense lawyer Mark Cohen seemed buried in technical details—subsections in FTX’s terms of service, paragraphs deep within loan documents, provisions on customer clawbacks. And he failed to make his point on why he was going over these details so carefully. Moreover, the documents, largely introduced during direct questioning, supported the prosecution’s case, such as the line in the terms of service saying, “None of the Digital Assets in your Account are the property of, or shall or may be loaned to, FTX.”

It seems he is either trying to confuse the jury, and perhaps will argue that these lines within service agreements are what they should be concerned with. Or, he and the other defense lawyers may be gathering bases for a potential appeal. They’ve repeatedly said that Bankman-Fried isn’t getting his correct doses of Adderall nor promised access to computers and cannot meaningfully participate in his defense as a result, for instance, and seem to be lining that up as a clear appeal issue. Today, Cohen pointed to a line in the FTX Digital Markets terms of service saying that any dispute will be governed under English law (FTX Digital Markets was headquartered in the Bahamas, which uses English law), which could be another potential issue. And the defense has raised frequent objections to various prosecution questions and evidence, almost always a sign that they’ve got one eye on an appeal, given that any issues argued on appeal must be first raised at trial.

When the trial resumes in a week—the judge has a conference to attend in the interim—the prosecution said it expects to call an FBI witness, an investor witness, and a customer witness. Prosecutors initially said they would call FTX’s former head of product Ramnik Arora, but did not list him among next week’s witnesses. After those three witnesses, the prosecution said it will rest, indicating that Sun is the last of the FTX prosecution witnesses to testify. The defense will then reveal what case, if any, it will put on (no defense case is required in criminal trials, as the burden of proof is on the prosecution), and presumably, whether Bankman-Fried himself will take the stand.

By

22 thoughts on “Former FTX lawyer: Sam Bankman-Fried promised customer assets were ‘safeguarded’”
  1. Hello there, I believe your web site might be having web browser compatibility problems.
    Whenever I look at your site in Safari, it looks fine however, if
    opening in I.E., it’s got some overlapping issues.
    I merely wanted to provide you with a quick heads up!
    Besides that, wonderful website!

  2. hello!,I really like your writing so so much!
    percentage we keep up a correspondence extra approximately
    your article on AOL? I require an expert on this house to solve my problem.
    May be that’s you! Taking a look ahead to look you.

  3. Hi, i think that i saw you visited my web site thus
    i got here to return the desire?.I am trying to to find issues to enhance my web site!I guess
    its adequate to use a few of your ideas!!

  4. It is appropriate time to make some plans for the future and
    it’s time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I
    could I wish to suggest you some interesting things or advice.
    Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I desire to read more things about it!

  5. I have to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this blog.
    I really hope to see the same high-grade blog posts by you in the future as well.
    In fact, your creative writing abilities has inspired
    me to get my own site now 😉

  6. Howdy would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re
    using? I’m going to start my own blog soon but I’m having a hard time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.

    The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique.
    P.S Sorry for being off-topic but I had to ask!

  7. Hello, i feel that i saw you visited my blog so i came
    to go back the prefer?.I’m attempting to to find things to improve
    my website!I guess its good enough to make use of some of your concepts!!

  8. My brother suggested I might like this web site. He was totally right.
    This post actually made my day. You cann’t imagine
    just how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

  9. I believe that is one of the so much important
    info for me. And i’m glad studying your article.
    But should statement on few general issues, The web site
    style is perfect, the articles is in point of fact great
    : D. Just right job, cheers

  10. Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative.
    I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue
    this in future. A lot of people will be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers!

  11. Wow, fantastic blog structure! How long have you ever been blogging for?

    you made blogging glance easy. The overall glance of your web site is excellent, let alone the content material!
    You can see similar here sklep internetowy

  12. Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO?
    I’m trying to get my site to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good gains.
    If you know of any please share. Kudos! You can read similar text here: List of Backlinks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *